| Individual
coaching case study |
 |
|
Client
The company is a multinational high technology
business. Project
Every manager in the company has done a
LEA 360™ Leadership Analysis, used
as a basis for individual coaching, aiming
at processing the results of the
feedback coming from self, direct reports,
peers and bosses on the use of leadership
behaviours, and
making a development plan based on the
results of LEA 360™ in line with
the requirements and standards that the
company has on its managers.
Tool: The use
of LEA™ Time period:
2006 – June 2007 Preparation
stage Meeting between the
coachée and his/her superior where
the latter describes his/her expectations
of the coachée, based on the company’s
strategically important leadership areas
and the individual assignment and challenges
of the coachée.
Administrative process with LEA™
– filling out the forms.
Coach and coachée meet to discuss
conditions of the coaching process
Coach and superior of the coachée
meet in order for the latter to describe
strengths and development areas for the
coachée.
Coaching process
Coach and coachée meet with superior
to process feedback data from LEA™
- profile and to decide about development
plan, action plan for the coaching process
and time plan
5 coaching sessions at 3 hours and coaching
follow up telephone calls
- The development plan was used at each
coaching as a foundation for the coaching
– what happened, what progress was
made, if not; what prevented it, what
support was needed and what should be
done till next time.
Coach’s conclusion meeting together
with the superior and HR representative,
including a summary of process and results.
Summary of results
The role as a coach was to support, confirm,
confront, give advice , and ask questions,
always focusing on the action plan The
goals set in the development plan were
reached
Communication and co-operation superior-coachée
were developed
Coachée commitment and contribution
to the entire company was intensified
Through LEA™, coachée got
a foundation for continued assignment
Coachée became aware of importance
and technique for reflection
Coachée was supported in structuring
his work
Self confidence of the coachée
was enhanced |
| |
|
|